October 21 2025
Planning Commission Meeting
Topics
General Plan Update ("Holladay Horizons")
Continued review of the 2025 Comprehensive General Plan Update, File #00-6-04-2, focusing on Chapters 1, 2, and 3
Formatting and document changes
made by Logan Simpson in response to prior Commission feedback (photographs, introductory language, graphics, maps)
Commercial vs. Mixed-Use land use designations
Whether to consolidate commercial areas into mixed-use or maintain distinct commercial categories
Adjacent jurisdiction land use consistency
Whether Holladay should account for land use decisions by neighboring jurisdictions (e.g., Millcreek)
Protections for commercial uses within mixed-use zones
Ground-floor retail/commercial requirements in zones such as Holladay Crossroads
Opportunity Categories map (Pages 46–47)
Confusion over the Evolve, Sustain, and Protect categories and whether to retain or remove them
Small Area Master Plans
Their role in the General Plan and how to communicate them clearly to multiple audiences, including developers
City funding and economic strategy
Commissioner Cunningham's concern about over-reliance on property taxes and the need to shift revenue balance
Duplex language
Language in the draft stating duplexes would be allowed in all single-family zones; discussion of whether to soften language and clarify State law compliance
Moderate-Income Housing Plan
State requirements limiting flexibility for built-out cities like Holladay; specific language requirements from the State
Figure 4 – Annexation Map (Page 57)
Color differentiation issues making it difficult to read
Numbering of goals and policies
Restarting numbering by chapter with chapter-specific labels (e.g., "Housing Goal 1")
Cross-referencing across chapters
Proposal to add a summary chart of all goals, policies, and actions at the end of the document
Order of chapters
Discussion of how chapter sequence was determined (minutes appear cut off before full explanation)
Decisions
No formal resolutions or final decisions were adopted
at this meeting. The General Plan review is ongoing and will culminate in a recommendation to City Council.
The following directional agreements were reached by consensus:
- Remove the Evolve/Sustain/Protect Opportunity Categories from the map while retaining relevant language around entitled density
- Add chapter-specific numbering to goals and policies (e.g., "Housing Goal 1")
- Add a summary chart of all goals, policies, and actions at the end of the document
- Add links to Small Area Master Plans within the land use chapter
- Add an Appendix listing relevant State House and Senate bills, their requirements, and document locations
- Improve color differentiation on Figure 4 – Annexation Map
- Soften duplex language to clarify it reflects State law compliance rather than a City-initiated policy choice
Actions
Incorporate all prior and current Commission feedback into a revised draft; show substantive changes in red
Delaney Sillman / Logan SimpsonImprove map clarity for commercial land use areas, particularly along Highland Drive
Delaney Sillman / Logan SimpsonRemove Evolve/Sustain/Protect Opportunity Categories from map; retain relevant "entitled density" language
Delaney Sillman / Logan SimpsonMake explicit in the land use chapter which areas have associated Small Area Master Plans
Delaney Sillman / Logan SimpsonAdd hyperlinks to Small Area Master Plans within the document
Delaney Sillman / Logan SimpsonSoften duplex language; use suggested wording such as "Allow duplexes in single-family zones, as required by Utah Law"; ensure consistency across all sections
Delaney Sillman / Logan Simpson; reviewed by Jonathan Teerlink / Carrie MarshAdd Appendix listing State House and Senate bills, requirements, and document locations
Jonathan Teerlink / Carrie Marsh / Logan SimpsonFix color differentiation on Figure 4 – Annexation Map (Page 57)
Delaney Sillman / Logan SimpsonApply chapter-specific numbering to goals and policies (e.g., "Housing Goal 1")
Delaney Sillman / Logan SimpsonAdd a summary chart of all goals, policies, and actions at end of document
Delaney Sillman / Logan SimpsonFix map labeling issues noted by Commissioner Cunningham
Delaney Sillman / Logan SimpsonReview and potentially move the City funding/economics chapter to an earlier position in the document
Jonathan Teerlink / Logan Simpson (to be further discussed)Continue review of remaining chapters at future Planning Commission meetings
Full Commission / City Staff
Notes
No members of the public were present
; therefore, the Opening Statement was not read aloud and no public comments were received.
Chair Dennis Roach was absent
; Vice-Chair Karianne Prince presided over the meeting.
Low public engagement noted
Jonathan Teerlink reported that while there is general public interest in the General Plan update process, there have not been many formal public comments submitted to date.
State law constraints
City Attorney Brad Christopherson emphasized that built-out cities like Holladay have limited flexibility under State law regarding Moderate-Income Housing Plan strategies, and that the Legislature had to add options specifically to accommodate such cities.
4500 South Small Area Master Plan
Commissioner Gong inquired about a potential Small Area Master Plan for 4500 South; Jonathan Teerlink indicated this is not currently planned, as the road is under UDOT jurisdiction and UDOT partnership is unlikely.
Economic reliance on property taxes
Commissioner Cunningham highlighted a structural concern that the City of Holladay remains overly reliant on property taxes and recommended all Commissioners read the funding section of the General Plan draft.
Minutes appear incomplete
the document ends mid-sentence during Jonathan Teerlink's explanation of chapter ordering; the full discussion on that topic was not captured in the provided text.
Summarized April 22, 2026