HOLLADAY DIGEST

  • 09·22·26 Planning Commission
  • 09·17·26 City Council
  • 09·03·26 City Council
  • 08·20·26 City Council
  • 08·06·26 City Council
  • 08·04·26 Planning Commission
  • 07·16·26 City Council
  • 07·07·26 Planning Commission
  • 06·16·26 Planning Commission
  • 06·11·26 Local Building Authority (LBA)
  • 06·11·26 City Council
  • 06·04·26 City Council
  • 06·04·26 RDA Board
  • 06·04·26 Local Building Authority (LBA)
  • 06·04·26 City Council
  • 06·02·26 Planning Commission
  • 05·21·26 City Council
  • 05·21·26 City Council
  • 05·19·26 Planning Commission
  • 05·14·26 City Council
  • 05·07·26 City Council
  • 05·07·26 City Council
  • 04·28·26 Planning Commission
  • 04·23·26 City Council
  • 04·21·26 Planning Commission
  • 04·21·26 Planning Commission
  • 04·16·26 City Council
  • 04·16·26 City Council
  • 03·24·26 Planning Commission
  • 03·24·26 Planning Commission
  • 03·19·26 City Council
  • 03·05·26 City Council
  • 03·05·26 City Council
  • 03·03·26 Planning Commission
  • 03·03·26 Planning Commission
  • 02·19·26 City Council
  • 02·19·26 City Council
  • 02·17·26 Planning Commission
  • 02·05·26 City Council
  • 01·22·26 City Council
  • 01·20·26 Planning Commission
  • 01·09·26 2026 Legislative Meeting
  • 01·08·26 2026 Swearing in Ceremony
  • 01·08·26 City Council
  • 01·06·26 Planning Commission
  • 01·06·26 Planning Commission
  • 12·18·25 City Council
  • 12·16·25 Planning Commission
  • 12·16·25 Planning Commission
  • 12·11·25 City Council
  • 12·04·25 City Council
  • 12·02·25 Planning Commission
  • 11·20·25 City Council
  • 11·06·25 Local Building Authority (LBA)
  • 11·06·25 Council Work Mtg - Audio only
  • 11·06·25 City Council
  • 10·28·25 Planning Commission
  • 10·23·25 City Council
  • 10·21·25 Planning Commission
  • 10·07·25 Planning Commission
  • 10·02·25 Local Building Authority Mtg
  • 10·02·25 City Council
  • 09·30·25 Planning Commission
  • 09·30·25 Planning Commission
  • 09·18·25 Local Building Authority (LBA)
  • 09·18·25 City Council
  • 09·16·25 Planning Commission
  • 09·11·25 City Council
  • 09·02·25 Planning Commission
  • 08·28·25 City Council
  • 08·19·25 Planning Commission
  • 08·12·25 Planning Commission
  • 08·07·25 City Council
  • 07·17·25 City Council
  • 07·15·25 Planning Commission
  • 06·24·25 Planning Commission
  • 06·12·25 City Council
  • 06·05·25 City Council
  • 05·15·25 City Council
  • 05·08·25 City Council
  • 05·06·25 Planning Commission
  • 05·01·25 City Council
  • 04·17·25 City Council
  • 04·15·25 Planning Commission
  • 04·03·25 City Council
  • 04·01·25 Planning Commission
  • 03·20·25 City Council
  • 03·18·25 Planning Commission
  • 03·17·25 Admin Hearing Officer Meeting
  • 03·06·25 City Council
  • 03·04·25 Planning Commission
  • 02·20·25 City Council
  • 02·18·25 Planning Commission
  • 02·06·25 City Council
  • 02·04·25 Planning Commission
  • 01·23·25 City Council
  • 01·21·25 Planning Commission
  • 01·09·25 City Council
  • 01·09·25 City Council
  • 01·07·25 Planning Commission

March 24th, 2026

Planning Commission Meeting

View PDF

Topics

  • "Casper Cottage" Public Hearing

    Rescheduling of Historic Site Conditional Land Use Permit hearing originally on the agenda (4910 South Holladay Boulevard, R-2-10, File #26-1-05)

  • "Royal Holladay Hills, Block A and C" — Preliminary Site Plan Review

    • Overview of Block A's proposed development: three retail pads (two on north side, one on south side) within the Open Land Use District (O Zone) of the Site Development Master Plan (SDMP)
    • Recent amendment to the SDMP, including opening of the corner of Block A for retail development and relocation of parking to an approved parking garage
    • Building design and orientation of retail pads on Block A, including TRC concerns that the buildings "turn their backs" to Highland Drive and Murray Holladay Road
    • Applicant's request for administrative relief from Tree Canopy Sustainability Code landscaping requirements — specifically, removal of four interior parking lot landscape islands in exchange for an expanded landscape buffer along Highland Drive
    • Parking ratio discussion: proposed ratio of one space per 100 sq. ft. (double the required one space per 200 sq. ft.), noted as tenant-driven per Trader Joe's lease requirements
    • Walkability and street activation concerns at the Highland Drive and Murray Holladay Road corner
    • Mixed-use vision of the SDMP and whether individual blocks reflect that intent
    • Location and status of the central plaza referenced in the SDMP
    • Block C building design review: southernmost pad architecture (painted brick, glass storefronts), landscaping plan, and lighting plan
    • Absence of revised building elevation drawings for Block A prior to the meeting
    • Potential options for handling missing elevation drawings: deferral or delegation to the Community and Economic Development Director

Decisions

Note: The minutes as provided end mid-session (mid-sentence). No formal decisions or adopted resolutions are recorded in the available text. The following procedural determinations were noted:

  • The Public Hearing for "Casper Cottage" (File #26-1-05) was formally rescheduled to April 14, 2026.

  • No final action on "Royal Holladay Hills, Block A and C" is recorded in the available minutes.

Votes

No votes are recorded in the available portion of the minutes.

Actions

  • Reschedule and conduct "Casper Cottage" Public Hearing

    City Staff / Planning CommissionNotesRescheduled to April 14, 2026
  • Applicant to submit revised building elevation drawings for Block A

    Applicant team (Steve Peterson / Chris Longson)NotesDrawings were not delivered to the applicant team before the meeting; Planning Commission to determine whether to defer or delegate review to Jonathan Teerlink
  • Applicant to address TRC concerns regarding building design and orientation for Block A

    Applicant team (Steve Peterson / Chris Longson)NotesTRC noted buildings turn away from primary streets; additional architectural detail to be considered
  • Applicant to work on revised landscape drawings to address TRC concerns

    Applicant team (Steve Peterson / Chris Longson)NotesMr. Longson stated "no issue" with revising landscape drawings
  • Planning Commission to moderate discussion with applicant on administrative relief request for landscape islands

    Planning Commission / Jonathan TeerlinkNotesPer TRC recommendation; decision on relocation of tree islands from interior of parking lot to perimeter not yet finalized
  • Planning Commission to moderate discussion on Block C southernmost pad architecture

    Planning Commission / Jonathan TeerlinkNotesBuilding design, landscaping plan, and lighting plan submitted; discussion ongoing

Notes

  • No members of the public were present

    at the Regular Meeting; the Chair's Opening Statement was not read aloud.

  • Commissioner Gong raised walkability concerns

    , noting the corner of Highland Drive and Murray Holladay Road does not invite pedestrian access and has too many parking lot openings interrupting the streetscape.

  • Commissioner Gong questioned SDMP mixed-use vision

    , noting that while the overall site is technically mixed-use, individual blocks — including Block A — do not reflect mixed-use development, and the location of the central plaza referenced in the SDMP remains unclear.

  • Commissioner Berndt raised architectural concerns

    , stating the building design appears generic and that cornerstone intersections should be more dynamic and original. Jonathan Teerlink agreed with this assessment.

  • Heat island concern

    raised by Chair Roach regarding the removal of interior parking lot landscape islands, noting this would be counterproductive to the intent of the amended Tree Canopy Sustainability Code.

  • Trader Joe's lease constraints

    were cited by the applicant representative Chris Longson as limiting factors for parking stall counts and maximum square footage on Block A, preventing additional density from being added.

  • Landscape berm clarification

    The existing berm along Highland Drive was confirmed to already exist; the applicant's proposal would widen it rather than raise the parking lot elevation, though Mr. Longson acknowledged this approach could cost more than a standard compliant layout.

  • Historic marker and transformer

    are located along Murray Holladay Road near Royce Drive and were noted as site context considerations.

  • The minutes end mid-sentence and appear incomplete; subsequent discussion, any motions, votes, or closing remarks are not captured in the provided document.

Summary based solely on the meeting minutes as provided. Portions of the meeting occurring after the text ends are not reflected above.

Summarized July 2, 2026