HOLLADAY DIGEST

  • 09·22·26 Planning Commission
  • 09·17·26 City Council
  • 09·03·26 City Council
  • 08·20·26 City Council
  • 08·06·26 City Council
  • 08·04·26 Planning Commission
  • 07·16·26 City Council
  • 07·07·26 Planning Commission
  • 06·16·26 Planning Commission
  • 06·11·26 Local Building Authority (LBA)
  • 06·11·26 City Council
  • 06·04·26 City Council
  • 06·04·26 RDA Board
  • 06·04·26 Local Building Authority (LBA)
  • 06·04·26 City Council
  • 06·02·26 Planning Commission
  • 05·21·26 City Council
  • 05·21·26 City Council
  • 05·19·26 Planning Commission
  • 05·14·26 City Council
  • 05·07·26 City Council
  • 05·07·26 City Council
  • 04·28·26 Planning Commission
  • 04·23·26 City Council
  • 04·21·26 Planning Commission
  • 04·21·26 Planning Commission
  • 04·16·26 City Council
  • 04·16·26 City Council
  • 03·24·26 Planning Commission
  • 03·24·26 Planning Commission
  • 03·19·26 City Council
  • 03·05·26 City Council
  • 03·05·26 City Council
  • 03·03·26 Planning Commission
  • 03·03·26 Planning Commission
  • 02·19·26 City Council
  • 02·19·26 City Council
  • 02·17·26 Planning Commission
  • 02·05·26 City Council
  • 01·22·26 City Council
  • 01·20·26 Planning Commission
  • 01·09·26 2026 Legislative Meeting
  • 01·08·26 2026 Swearing in Ceremony
  • 01·08·26 City Council
  • 01·06·26 Planning Commission
  • 01·06·26 Planning Commission
  • 12·18·25 City Council
  • 12·16·25 Planning Commission
  • 12·16·25 Planning Commission
  • 12·11·25 City Council
  • 12·04·25 City Council
  • 12·02·25 Planning Commission
  • 11·20·25 City Council
  • 11·06·25 Local Building Authority (LBA)
  • 11·06·25 Council Work Mtg - Audio only
  • 11·06·25 City Council
  • 10·28·25 Planning Commission
  • 10·23·25 City Council
  • 10·21·25 Planning Commission
  • 10·07·25 Planning Commission
  • 10·02·25 Local Building Authority Mtg
  • 10·02·25 City Council
  • 09·30·25 Planning Commission
  • 09·30·25 Planning Commission
  • 09·18·25 Local Building Authority (LBA)
  • 09·18·25 City Council
  • 09·16·25 Planning Commission
  • 09·11·25 City Council
  • 09·02·25 Planning Commission
  • 08·28·25 City Council
  • 08·19·25 Planning Commission
  • 08·12·25 Planning Commission
  • 08·07·25 City Council
  • 07·17·25 City Council
  • 07·15·25 Planning Commission
  • 06·24·25 Planning Commission
  • 06·12·25 City Council
  • 06·05·25 City Council
  • 05·15·25 City Council
  • 05·08·25 City Council
  • 05·06·25 Planning Commission
  • 05·01·25 City Council
  • 04·17·25 City Council
  • 04·15·25 Planning Commission
  • 04·03·25 City Council
  • 04·01·25 Planning Commission
  • 03·20·25 City Council
  • 03·18·25 Planning Commission
  • 03·17·25 Admin Hearing Officer Meeting
  • 03·06·25 City Council
  • 03·04·25 Planning Commission
  • 02·20·25 City Council
  • 02·18·25 Planning Commission
  • 02·06·25 City Council
  • 02·04·25 Planning Commission
  • 01·23·25 City Council
  • 01·21·25 Planning Commission
  • 01·09·25 City Council
  • 01·09·25 City Council
  • 01·07·25 Planning Commission

June 16th, 2026

Planning Commission Meeting

View PDF

Topics

  • Item 1 (Continued)

    Wasatch Waldorf Charter School — site plan amendment review (continued from a prior meeting, approximately March or May 19)

    • Off-site parking agreement with LDS Church (primary) and senior care center (secondary)
    • Emergency fire lane access width behind the school — approval from Unified Fire Authority and State Fire Marshall's Office
    • Floodplain and stream bank protection concerns; Salt Lake County Flood Control permitting process
    • Neighboring property owner noise concerns and statutory limitations on city review authority
  • Item 2

    Zone map amendment — rezone from single-family residential (R-1) to Public (P) zone for property owned by Holiday Memorial Cemetery, intended for cemetery expansion

  • Item 3

    Text amendment to Holiday Village building height standards — application to increase maximum height from 35 feet to 50 feet for a specific highlighted area within the village zone

    • History of prior height moratorium (~2016) and subsequent height reductions
    • Staff does not support the 50-foot increase as proposed
    • Approximately a dozen public comments received; none in favor
    • Discussion of potential alternative approaches (stepped heights, 40-foot compromise, architectural/contextual standards)

(Transcript ends mid-discussion of Item 3; Items 4 and 5 not captured)

Decisions

  • No formal decisions or resolutions are recorded in the available transcript. Discussion was ongoing at the point the transcript was cut off.

  • Item 1 (Wasatch Waldorf)

    Staff (TRC) confirmed both outstanding conditions — parking agreement and fire lane dimensions — have been satisfied and are ready for final Planning Commission action. No vote recorded in transcript.

  • Item 2 (Cemetery rezone)

    No vote recorded in transcript.

  • Item 3 (Holiday Village heights)

    No vote recorded in transcript; still under deliberation.

Votes

No votes recorded in the available transcript.

Actions

  • Wasatch Waldorf applicant to continue working with Salt Lake County Flood Control on flood control permitting

    Applicant (Wasatch Waldorf)
  • Maintain protection of all trees at the apex of the creek; confirm no impact from driveway expansion

    Applicant / City Staff (John Given)
  • All 2016 original approval conditions for Wasatch Waldorf to remain in place

    Staff to ensure conditions carry forward
  • Commission to continue review and deliberation on Holiday Village height text amendment (Item 3)

    Planning Commission

Notes

  • Commissioner conflict of interest inquiry

    One Commissioner noted their mother is buried at Holiday Memorial Cemetery (subject of Item 2 rezone) and asked whether recusal was required. Staff indicated no financial gain is involved; recusal was determined to be unnecessary.

  • Public comments — Holiday Village heights (Item 3)

    Approximately a dozen comments were emailed to Commissioners approximately two hours before the meeting; none were in favor of the height increase to 50 feet.

  • Staff position on Item 3

    Director John Given stated staff could not support a height increase from 35 to 50 feet, citing the 2016 moratorium study and Council goals that led to height reductions. A possible compromise of 40 feet with architectural review and stepped heights (higher along Holiday Blvd., stepping down toward residential) was floated by Commissioners but not formally proposed.

  • Floodplain context (Item 1)

    Staff noted Creekside Park is a flood retention basin with an earthen dam; 1983 flood modeling shows significant inundation potential for homes west of the dam to 9th East. The school has an existing flood control permit; any modifications remain the applicant's responsibility at the county level.

  • Transcript note

    The transcript ends mid-discussion of Item 3; Items 4 and 5 on the agenda are not captured.

Summarized June 17, 2026